From cd3447f1cad16972e8a659ec6e84764c5b8b2745 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Douglas B. Rumbaugh" <doug@douglasrumbaugh.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 13:15:52 -0400
Subject: Julia updates

---
 chapters/sigmod23/exp-parameter-space.tex | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

(limited to 'chapters/sigmod23/exp-parameter-space.tex')

diff --git a/chapters/sigmod23/exp-parameter-space.tex b/chapters/sigmod23/exp-parameter-space.tex
index 9583312..1e51d8c 100644
--- a/chapters/sigmod23/exp-parameter-space.tex
+++ b/chapters/sigmod23/exp-parameter-space.tex
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
 \label{ssec:ds-exp}
 
 Our proposed framework has a large design space, which we briefly
-described in Section~\ref{ssec:design-space}. The contents of this
-space will be described in much more detail in Chapter~\ref{chap:design-space},
-but as part of this work we did perform an experimental examination of our
-framework to compare insertion throughput and query latency over various
-points within the space.
+described in Section~\ref{ssec:sampling-design-space}. The
+contents of this space will be described in much more detail in
+Chapter~\ref{chap:design-space}, but as part of this work we did perform
+an experimental examination of our framework to compare insertion
+throughput and query latency over various points within the space.
 
 We examined this design space by considering \texttt{DE-WSS} specifically,
 using a random sample of $500,000,000$ records from the \texttt{OSM}
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ performance, with tiering outperforming leveling for both delete
 policies. The next largest effect was the delete policy selection,
 with tombstone deletes outperforming tagged deletes in insertion
 performance. This result aligns with the asymptotic analysis of the two
-approaches in Section~\ref{sampling-deletes}. It is interesting to note
+approaches in Section~\ref{ssec:sampling-deletes}. It is interesting to note
 however that the effect of layout policy was more significant in these
 particular tests,\footnote{
     Although the largest performance gap in absolute terms was between
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

